Depth bar: Individual Sector 24 dossier for this legal entity only. Twin kit also exists at outreach/2026-09-lnm-peers/05-bhatia-alloy-forgings.md. Do not merge Plot 181 Brassoforge revenue, equipment or bills into this file.

1. Company overview & snapshot

This file covers Bhatia Alloy Forgings Pvt Ltd only. Public commercial brief puts the company at ~₹326 Cr [~], with aluminium forging, heat treatment and CNC machining in Faridabad Sector 24. Unit 3 rooftop solar is cited at 620 kW [~]. That cuts imported units; it does not automatically flatten maximum demand when presses and furnaces start together.

1.1 Legal identity & corporate structure

Unlisted private company. Confirm CIN, GSTIN and DHBVN consumer name before contracting. Trade and directory sources associate the promoter family with Brassoforge (Plot 181, 37-brassoforge). Related-party or brand overlap is not proof of one meter or one contracting entity. Match the bill heading to the legal name on the 60-Day Proof.

1.2 What they make & where money comes from

Aluminium closed-die and related forging, heat treatment, and machining of automotive and industrial components. Named OEM share is not used here unless a filing or company site states it. Export versus domestic mix is unknown until asked.

1.2a Scale, MSME status & trade

1.3 Plants, addresses & footprint

Scoped geography: Sector 24, Faridabad. Public materials refer to multiple units including Unit 3 with rooftop solar. Plot numbers for the HT proof must be taken from the bill or a gate visit. Plot 181 Brassoforge is a different file. Confirm whether units share a transformer or run separate consumers.

1.4 Leadership & CRM map — three champion types

Primary route: info@bhatiaalloy.com (verified generic). Do not invent personal inboxes.

1.5 Recent news and timing

Solar on Unit 3 is the live timing hook: plants that just cut kWh often still pay for coincident MD. Ask which meter sees the solar and which meter sees the forge/HT shop.

2. Energy profile

DISCOM / supply: DHBVN. Confirm consumer number, sanctioned load and tariff on two redacted bills.

2.1 Bill band, tariff & demand

Working plant estimate: ₹25–50L/month [~]. Band A likely if the HT manufacturing meter is in that range. Confidence Medium-low until invoices exist. Check MD, ToD, PF, penalties and whether solar is netted on the same consumer.

2.2 Generation, fuel & renewables

620 kW solar on Unit 3 [~]. Captive DG is common at forge plants [~]. HT furnaces may be electric, gas or mixed. Do not attribute fuel cost to the grid bill without confirmation.

2.3 EnMS, PAT, ISO, BRSR

Check IATF 16949 / ISO 14001 / ISO 45001 on site. No ISO 50001 claim is made here. Stamped is continuous M&V with outcomes verified with evidence, not another EnMS portal.

2.4 Likely rupee leak categories

• Coincident furnace preheat and press starts on one DHBVN peak.
• Sealed-quench / mesh-belt or equivalent HT hold.
• Compressed air and quench pumps.
• Hydraulic press idle between batches.
• Shift-change MD stacks after solar has already cut kWh.

3. Operations, equipment & digital stack

3.1 Process flow & critical loads

Aluminium forging → heat treatment → CNC machine shop. Critical electrical loads are presses, HT (if electric), quench support, compressors and machine-shop idle. Solar generation is a kWh offset, not a process control.

3.1a Machine inventory

3.2 Shifts, seasonality and production pattern

Unknown. Baseline must use the plant’s own output: tonnes, strokes, machine hours or equivalent components.

3.3 Automation, metering, SCADA/EMS/DCS

No named EMS vendor is assumed. Start with bills and interval data, then read-only feeder or machine exports. No PLC writes in the proof.

3.4 Capex / tech projects affecting energy

Unit 3 solar is the known project. Ask commissioning date and which consumer it sits on. New presses or furnaces in the last 24 months need a separate baseline.

4. Stamped Energy fit analysis

4.1 ICP scorecard

4.2 Fit score rationale

9/10. Process and revenue fit. Deductions: bill is estimated; solar can confuse a naive kWh pitch; Brassoforge overlap must not contaminate the contracting entity.

4.3 Wedge

The strongest wedge is: separate solar kWh from MD coincidence on presses and heat treatment, scoped to one legal DHBVN consumer and verified against the plant’s own production context.

4.4 Objections & competitors

“We already watch the bill” is answered with assigned rupee actions and verification with evidence. “We put solar on Unit 3” is the opening, not a kill: MD can still move. “HT is gas” pivots to presses, quench support, compressors and MD overlap. Internal maintenance and OEM dashboards are alternatives; proceed only if Stamped adds a closed execution loop.

4.5 Pilot design

Two bills → map solar versus process meters → one controllable press or HT event class → 60-Day Proof only if the bill supports ROI. Success is one production-cleared action with defensible evidence. Kill if the scoped meter is not captive manufacturing, the bill is below the commercial floor, or Brassoforge and Bhatia Alloy are being mixed without consumer proof.

4.6 Concern scores

4.7 Pitch sketches

P&L: After solar, the remaining leak is usually coincident press and furnace starts. Verify on two bills first.

Maintenance: One stagger or idle-off action they can run without new hardware.

Production: No recommendation changes the forge schedule unless output and quality stay protected.

5. Before you reach out

5.1 Discovery checklist

• Confirm legal name, GSTIN and active factory.
• Obtain two DHBVN bills.
• Map Unit 3 solar to the consumer number.
• Keep Brassoforge Plot 181 on a separate file.
• Name maintenance and production owners.
• Choose tonnes or strokes as the normalisation metric.
• Confirm data export and change-control limits.

5.2 Do not lead with

• Do not lead with AI, ESG, dashboards or a savings guarantee.
• Do not pitch another rooftop or solar O&M product.
• Do not borrow Brassoforge facts into this contracting entity.
• Do not price before the bill gate.

5.3 Opening hooks

“Before any proposal, can we verify the legal entity, two bills, and whether press and furnace coincidence still owns the DHBVN peak after Unit 3 solar?”

6. Risks, flags & sources

6.1 Integrity / controversy / regulatory

No material company-specific controversy was found in the limited public-source pass. This is not legal clearance. Search again for the exact legal name plus NGT, HSPCB, fraud, lawsuit, insolvency, labour and tax before active outreach.

6.2 Data quality flags

• Revenue and bill band are estimates, not invoice-derived.
• Plot numbers for the HT proof are incomplete in public sources.
• Brassoforge / Bhatia Alloy relationship is a contracting risk if meters are mixed.
• Personal emails for secondary contacts were not published.

6.3 Sources consulted

• https://www.bhatiaalloy.com
• outreach/2026-09-lnm-peers/05-bhatia-alloy-forgings.md
• outreach/research/2026-09-lnm-peers/05-bhatia-alloy-forgings.md
• Company LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bhatia-alloy-forgings-pvt-ltd
• Related but separate: outreach/research/2026-08-faridabad/37-brassoforge.md