Depth bar (mandatory): Strategic listed Faridabad cluster. Target 2,500–4,000 words. Exhaustive subsections 1.1–6.3. Use
[~]for estimates,[dir]for directories,[!]for unverified claims. Never invent bill numbers, court outcomes, or plant-head emails. ICP override for large listed: plant-scoped 60-Day Proof can proceed even when group procurement is slow — qualify the Faridabad HT, not the whole NSE entity, on day one.
1. Company overview & snapshot
Poly Medicure Limited (brand Polymed) is a listed Indian manufacturer of disposable medical devices — infusion therapy, renal, blood management, and a growing “others” bag that now includes cardiology and critical care. For Stamped’s Faridabad campaign the only sites that matter on the calendar are the DHBVN manufacturing plots in Ballabgarh / IMT: Sector 59 (104-105, 115-116, and 117 on later investor maps) and Sector 68 IMT plots 33-34 (IMT 1 and IMT 2). Okhla is the registered / communication office. Jaipur SEZ, Haridwar, Palwal (under construction), YEIDA land, and overseas plants (Italy, Netherlands, Egypt, China) are context, not this week’s walk.
The industrial logic is straightforward. High-volume injection moulding, automated assembly of cannula/IV sets, and ISO 7/8-class cleanroom HVAC with chillers, AHUs, compressed air, and water-for-injection / RO-DM loops sit on multiple HT incomers in one city. That is a utilities-heavy campus, not a warehouse. BRSR already publishes group energy in GJ and a 9.9 MWp AMPIN captive solar PPA. Stamped’s offer is assigned rupee actions on one Faridabad feeder, verified with evidence, not another sustainability slide.
1.1 Legal identity & corporate structure
| Field | Public record (verify before contract) |
|---|---|
| Legal name | Poly Medicure Limited (trading Polymed) |
| CIN | L40300DL1995PLC066923 — not L40300DL1995PLC067008 (that number does not match letterhead / BSE filings) |
| Listing | NSE POLYMED · BSE 531768 · ISIN INE205C01021 |
| Incorporation | 1995 · ROC Delhi |
| Registered office | 232B, 3rd Floor, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi 110020 |
| Plant phones (letterhead) | +91-129-4287000, 3355070 · user brief also 2307000 |
| Delhi phones | +91-11-33550700, 47317000 |
| IR / CS emails | investorcare@polymedicure.com (ver) · cs@polymedicure.com (ver) · info@polymedicure.com (letterhead) |
| Authorised capital (31 Mar 2025) | ₹60 Cr (12 Cr equity shares of ₹5) [AR] |
| Promoters | Baid family — Himanshu Baid (MD), Rishi Baid (JMD), Vishal Baid (ED), Jugal Kishore Baid (promoter director) |
| Shareholding 31 Mar 2026 | Promoters 62.40% [IR] |
FY26 IR consolidates PendraCare (from 23 Sep 2025) and Citieffe (from 7 Nov 2025), plus Brazil vehicle Medyneo. None of that changes the Faridabad DHBVN invoice name. Contracting entity must match the Haryana bill — almost certainly Poly Medicure Limited.
1.2 What they make & where money comes from
Core SKUs: IV cannulae, infusion sets, renal / dialysis consumables and machines, blood-management devices, and a long tail of surgery, anaesthesia, urology, and newer cardiology/critical-care lines. Investor decks cite 225+ devices, ~1.8 billion devices/year capacity, 125+ countries, 390+ patents, 1,000+ distributors. Treat capacity marketing as group-level, not Sector 59 throughput.
Money mix (consol):
| Period | Revenue | India | Europe | RoW / international |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY25 | ₹1,669.8 Cr | ₹486.3 Cr | ₹557.4 Cr | ₹613.5 Cr RoW; international ₹1,170.9 Cr (~70%) |
| FY26 | ₹1,875.3 Cr | ₹581.7 Cr | ₹597.0 Cr | ₹683.2 Cr RoW; international ₹1,280.2 Cr |
| Q1 FY26 | ₹403.2 Cr | ₹125.7 Cr (+20.1%) | ₹133.3 Cr (−6.7%) | ₹141.8 Cr RoW |
Infusion therapy is still the largest slice (FY26 consol ₹997.3 Cr); renal ₹187.6 Cr; “Others” ₹690.4 Cr. Customers are hospitals and distributors globally — not auto OEMs. Energy still hits plant P&L: chillers do not care that the SKU is a cannula.
1.2a Scale, MSME status & trade (mandatory from Aug 2026)
| Field | Value | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue (latest FY) | Consol ₹1,875.3 Cr FY26 / ₹1,669.8 Cr FY25 · Standalone FY26 ₹1,662.5 Cr | IR 25 May 2026 / AR FY25 |
| MSME class | Not MSME (listed large) | Turnover and listing |
| Employees | 3,082 permanent FY25 [AR] · 3,300+ FY26 [IR] | High |
| Import intensity | Polymers, resins, cannula steel, machines, moulds — material; not quantified as % of RM in this pass | Medium |
| Export share | International ~68–70% of consol FY25–26; Europe + RoW both material | High (IR geo split) |
| Capex | ₹325 Cr FY25 [results release] · ₹296 Cr FY26 [IR] · QIP Aug 2024 ₹1,000 Cr earmarked for manufacturing facilities | High |
| Solar / RE | AMPIN C&I JV 26/74 for captive solar in Haryana; BRSR names 9.9 MWp PPA; rooftop expanded; FY26 IR claims ~8% Scope 2 cut vs FY25 from solar/PPA | High that it exists; Faridabad meter impact unknown |
1.3 Plants, addresses & footprint
Faridabad cluster (this campaign):
| Site | Address / role | DISCOM | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sector 59 — 104-105 | HSIIDC Industrial Area, Ballabgarh 121004 | DHBVN | Core Faridabad plant on letterhead |
| Sector 59 — 115-116 | Same estate | DHBVN | Same letterhead block |
| Sector 59 — 117 | Named on IR plant maps (Q1 FY26 / FY26) | DHBVN [~] | Confirm whether separate HT |
| IMT 1 / IMT 2 | Plots 33-34, Sector 68 IMT, Faridabad 121004 | DHBVN | R&D centre also mapped at IMT |
| Palwal, Haryana | Blood bags (+50%) and infusion; complete by end FY27 [IR Mar 2026] | DHBVN (Palwal is still Haryana DHBVN) | Not operating as a visit plant yet |
| Okhla 232B | Registered / IR | N/A | Routing only |
Out of Faridabad visit week: Haridwar 1 (commercially operational) and Haridwar 2; Jaipur SEZ 1 and 2; gamma sterilisation (captive, commercially operational — location confirm); YEIDA land near Noida airport (handover “expected soon” as of Mar 2026 IR); Amaro & Bologna (Italy), Leek (Netherlands), Assiut (Egypt), Laiyang-Qingdao (China).
IR machine counts are group: 400+ moulding machines, 1,800+ moulds & dies, 530+ automatic assembly machines, 130+ robots. Do not assign those counts to Sector 59 alone.
Pilot recommendation: One HT boundary — either the heavier Sector 59 incomer (cleanroom + moulding) or IMT if that plot’s bill is larger. Never a 15-plant SOW.
1.4 Leadership & CRM map — three champion types (mandatory)
| Type | Who | Why we talk to them |
|---|---|---|
| P&L / energy-bill champion | K. L. Gupta — Plant Head, Faridabad since ~2013 · https://www.linkedin.com/in/k-l-gupta-3a366a1b · email kl.gupta@polymedicure.com (inferred — confirm) | Feels the Faridabad DHBVN cluster; visit owner. Do not email investorcare@ as if it were personal. Optional later: Himanshu Baid MD (electronics & communication, Karnatak University) · https://www.linkedin.com/in/himanshu-baid-0a34ba15 |
| Maintenance / E&I actor | Ramniwas Pal — Sr Manager Maintenance (Automation) · https://www.linkedin.com/in/ramniwas-pal-a593b15b (current) · plus Abhit Kumar Gupta (utility/project) · https://www.linkedin.com/in/abhit-kumar-gupta-b35347322 · Rahul Dev Bhardwaj (Sector 59 HVAC) · https://www.linkedin.com/in/rahul-dev-bhardwaj-337172143 | They execute chiller/AHU setback, compressor idle, stagger. Kartar Singh Rawat (Deputy Manager Utility) left May 2026 — former; https://www.linkedin.com/in/kartar-singh-rawat-84285074 — use his old JD as process map only (HVAC AHU, HT/LT, chillers, cooling towers, compressed air, RO/DM/WFI/STP, injection moulding, packaging) |
| Production / line champion | K. L. Gupta also owns plant output (cleanroom/assembly + moulding). LinkedIn mentions CNC [!]. Hunt unnamed production / assembly GM on visit. | They veto anything that risks ISO 13485 batch or cleanroom differential pressure |
Decision path: K.L. Gupta yes → Ramniwas / HVAC engineer executes → production/QA vetoes setpoint changes that touch validated processes → finance for bill copies → secretarial/legal if MSA. Himanshu is not first touch. CS Avinash Chandra (M.No. A32270) and IR inbox are routing, not plant P&L.
CFO in AR remuneration table: Naresh Vijayvergiya — later for bill-band, not cold outreach.
1.5 Recent news (24 months) & timing for Stamped
- FY25: Consol net sales ₹1,669.83 Cr (+21%), EBITDA ₹541.97 Cr, capex ₹325 Cr, QIP residual still large at 31 Mar 2025.
- FY26: Consol ₹1,875.3 Cr (+12.3%); standalone growth slower (+3.8%) while M&A (PendraCare, Citieffe) padded consol. Capex ₹296 Cr. ~8% Scope 2 reduction vs FY25 claimed via solar/PPA.
- Q1 FY26: Europe −6.7%; domestic +20.1% — do not open on “export boom.”
- Palwal end FY27 — not this Proof. Gamma commercially operational — ask if on a Faridabad meter.
- Stamp duty order (15 Jun 2026): Delhi Revenue ₹2.5 Cr; company contests. Not a plant-integrity story.
Timing: Sector 59 is on the LNM belt. Ask for plant utilities at 104-105 / 115-116; use investorcare only as labelled routing.
2. Energy profile
DISCOM / supply (name early): DHBVN (Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam) for Faridabad Sector 59 HSIIDC and IMT Sector 68. Palwal, when it commissions, is still Haryana DHBVN, not a UP DISCOM. Confirm consumer name, tariff (HT/EHT), sanctioned kVA, ToD, PF, and whether rooftop / AMPIN PPA alters marginal kWh vs MD.
2.1 Bill band, tariff & demand
No plant-level DHBVN invoice is in hand.
Working Faridabad cluster bill: ₹15–40 lakh/month [~] across Sector 59 + IMT plots. Single plot may sit in Band B; cluster may approach Band A. ₹30L+ Possible on cluster. Qualify meter-by-meter. Confidence: Medium.
BRSR FY24-25 group energy (not a Faridabad bill):
| Parameter | FY25 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|
| Renewable electricity | 8,608 GJ | 5,012 GJ |
| Non-renewable electricity | 198,514 GJ | 164,807 GJ |
| Non-renewable fuel | 40,261 GJ | 16,483 GJ |
| Total energy | 247,383 GJ | 186,302 GJ |
That electricity block is company reporting boundary, on the order of ~50–60 million kWh/year [~] if converted naively — do not divide by 12 and call it Sector 59. India manufacturing (Faridabad + Haridwar + Jaipur) is a large share of that, but overseas plants and sterilisation sit in the same tables. Use BRSR only to prove they already measure energy; use two redacted HT bills for ₹.
Inspect on first bills: contract vs billing demand, ratchet, ToD, PF incentive/penalty, whether chillers and moulding share an incomer, solar export/net metering.
2.2 Generation, fuel & renewables
- AMPIN C&I JV: Polymed 26%, AMPIN 74%, captive solar for Haryana manufacturing. BRSR: PPA tied to 9.9 MWp, projected ~28% Scope 2 cut when fully supplying (group claim). FY26 IR: ~8% Scope 2 reduction already vs FY24-25.
- Rooftop solar expanded (BRSR). Plot-level unknown.
- Dual-fuel DG and CNG vehicles named for Scope 1. DG backup typical — confirm run-hours.
- Fuel GJ jumped FY24→FY25 (16.5k → 40.3k) — ask what burned (PNG, diesel, LPG for WFI/steam) and which Faridabad plot.
- RE does not erase MD from coincident chiller + moulding starts.
2.3 EnMS, PAT, ISO, BRSR
- BRSR: Yes — FY23-24 and FY24-25. Energy tables, Scope 1/2, water, solar PPA.
- ISO 9001:2015, ISO 13485:2016, ISO 14001:2015 — public (BRSR principle mapping). FY26 IR: ~70% of facilities ISO 14001.
- ISO 50001: not found in AR, BRSR certifications list, or IR. Do not infer EnMS certification from ISO 14001.
- PAT DC: BRSR explicit No.
- Internal: “digital energy management tools” cited as avoiding ~120 tCO2e
[BRSR]— treat as a monitoring experiment, not assigned rupee closure.
Stamped line: you already report GJ and buy solar — we turn recurring HVAC/moulding events into owned WhatsApp actions and keep them verified with evidence.
2.4 Likely ₹ leak categories (hypothesis)
Tied to med-device Faridabad, not auto:
- Cleanroom HVAC / AHU / chiller running production setpoints through changeover, batch gaps, and second-shift underload — usually the kWh hog.
- WFI / RO-DM / STP pumps and heat at night.
- Injection-moulding coincident starts (400+ machines group-wide; local count unknown) creating MD with chillers already at peak.
- Compressed air for assembly and packaging — leak + pressure setpoint.
- Automated assembly idle (530+ machines group-wide).
- ToD vs solar self-consumption mis-scheduling of non-validated loads.
- Multi-plot blindness — group BRSR known; which Faridabad feeder owns the peak unknown.
- Gamma / sterilisation if on a Faridabad incomer
[?].
Each is a hypothesis for interval data + production calendar. Never propose dropping cleanroom differential pressure.
3. Operations, equipment & digital stack
3.1 Process flow & critical loads
Typical route: polymer / cannula incoming → injection moulding → cleanroom automated assembly (IV/cannula lines) → packaging → sterilisation (ETO / gamma — site-specific) → warehouse / export.
Critical electrical loads: chillers, AHUs, WFI/RO, compressors, moulding machines, assembly automation, HVAC for warehouses, packing. MD events: Monday / shift-open chiller recovery + multi-cell moulding starts. kWh: 24×7 cleanroom air.
K.L. Gupta profile mentions CNC [!] — toolroom, not the energy centre.
No public Yaskawa HT. Heat treatment is not this plant’s story.
3.1a Machine inventory (mandatory from Aug 2026)
Name what is publicly evidenced vs [~] vs unknown. Do not invent OEM counts for Sector 59.
| Class | Present? | Count / size if public | OEM / brand if named | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNC turning / lathe | Possible [!] | Unknown locally | Unnamed | K.L. Gupta profile mentions CNC |
| VMC / HMC | Unknown | Toolroom only if present | ||
| HPDC / LPDC / GDC | No | Not a die-caster | ||
| Forge | No | |||
| Heat treatment | No public electric / Yaskawa HT | Do not invent | ||
| Press / stamping | Unknown | Packaging/secondary only [~] | ||
| Injection / blow mould | Yes | 400+ moulding machines, 1,800+ moulds group [IR] | Unnamed | Faridabad share unknown |
| No | ||||
| Melt | No | |||
| Automated assembly | Yes | 530+ machines, 130+ robots group [IR] | Unnamed | Cannula / IV |
| Compressors / HVAC / chillers / WFI | Yes | Unnamed counts | Unnamed | Kartar JD: HVAC AHU, chillers, cooling towers, compressed air, RO/DM/WFI/STP — energy hog |
If HT exists: it does not, on public evidence. Sterilisation heat is a different question (ETO vs gamma).
3.2 Shifts, seasonality, production pattern
Export + hospital demand implies multi-shift cleanroom. Validated processes mean weekend HVAC often stays live while output falls — false baseline risk. Normalise Proof to devices packed or standard hours, not calendar kWh. Q1 Europe dips do not automatically cut Faridabad HVAC.
3.3 Automation, metering, SCADA/EMS/DCS
High automation (robots, auto-assembly) implies cell PLC/HMI. Named plantwide EMS/SCADA vendor not public. BRSR “digital energy management tools” = some metering appetite. Path A if historian export exists; Path B = DHBVN CSV + chiller/moulding event log. No PLC writes. Cyber questionnaire likely for a listed med-device plant.
3.4 Capex / tech projects affecting energy
₹325 Cr FY25 + ₹296 Cr FY26 + QIP manufacturing spend + IMT expansion + Palwal FY27 + gamma facility. Post-capex, Stamped verifies operational capture of expected bill benefit rather than claiming the capex as its saving. Ask commissioning dates on the chosen Faridabad plot so the 60-Day Proof is not a construction mess.
4. Stamped Energy fit analysis
4.1 ICP scorecard
| Gate | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Geography (North / Faridabad) | Pass | DHBVN |
| Vertical (process manufacturing) | Pass | Med-device moulding + cleanroom — energy intensive |
| Bill ≥ ₹30L/mo | Possible (cluster) [~] — ₹15–40L cluster; single plot maybe Band B | |
| Revenue / scale | Pass | Listed, ₹1,600 Cr+ |
| Decision speed | Fail–slow | Listed procurement, ISO 13485 change control |
| Data maturity | Medium | BRSR + automation; EMS vendor unknown |
| Champion access | Medium | Named plant head + maintenance LinkedIn |
ICP override for large listed: Do not disqualify because IR exists. Qualify (a) Faridabad HT band, (b) K.L. Gupta sponsor, (c) bounded 60-Day Proof.
4.2 Fit score rationale
8/10 strategic / listed. Strengths: process intensity (HVAC + moulding), named plant head, named maintenance, verified IR emails, BRSR energy depth, local multi-plot campus, logo value. Deductions: enterprise cycle, bill unverified at plot level, solar PPA may shrink kWh faster than MD, change-control friction in a regulated plant, risk of conversation escaping to group digital / ESG.
4.3 Wedge (parser-critical)
The strongest wedge is: cleanroom HVAC / chiller / WFI continuous load plus injection-moulding and assembly coincidence on one Faridabad DHBVN HT (Sector 59 104-105/115-116 or IMT 33-34), turned into owned WhatsApp rupee actions and kept verified with evidence on Stamped’s ledger — complementing BRSR/solar work rather than replacing it.
4.4 Objections & competitors
| Objection | Response |
|---|---|
| We have solar / AMPIN PPA | Helps kWh mix; does not sequence chiller vs moulding MD. |
| ISO 13485 / we cannot touch setpoints | Read-only; stagger and idle only where QA already allows. |
| Send a group RFP | After two HT bills and one plot scope. |
| LNM next door | Light local colour only — do not oversell an SME forge reference. |
Competitors: chiller OEMs, compressed-air vendors, ISO 14001 consultants, solar EPCs, internal digital-energy tools.
4.5 Pilot design
- Site: One Faridabad HT (prefer heavier of Sector 59 vs IMT).
- Scope: HVAC/chillers + moulding coincidence; 60-Day Proof.
- Weeks 1–2: bills, feeder map, cleanroom constraints, security path.
- Weeks 3–8: weekly ranked cards; WhatsApp to Ramniwas / HVAC owner.
- Weeks 9–12: verify with evidence; optional DISCOM line.
- Success: one owned action with defensible ₹ movement.
- Kill: chosen meter below commercial floor; no plant sponsor; no data path in 14 days; demand for 15-plant SOW; IR-only conversation.
4.6 Concern scores (1–10) and who owns them (mandatory from Aug 2026)
Score this Faridabad cluster, not “medtech in general.” 10 = weekly C-suite / plant-head issue.
| Concern | Score | Who owns it | Why this score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy / electricity bill | 7 | K.L. Gupta / plant P&L | Multi-plot HVAC is expensive; solar narrative already exists so bill is felt but not always owned as an operating lever. Cluster may hit ₹30L [~]. |
| Maintenance / uptime / utilities | 8 | Ramniwas Pal / HVAC engineers | Chillers, WFI, compressed air, AHU — night call-outs and validated environment. Kartar’s exit (May 2026) may have left a utility gap. |
| Production line / OEE / dispatch | 8 | K.L. Gupta / assembly | Export OTIF + ISO 13485; energy Rx must not fight cleanroom or moulding cycle. |
| Overall plant efficiency | 7 | Plant Head | Capex-heavy years (FY25–26); efficiency is real but framed as capacity, not DHBVN MD. |
4.7 Pitch sketches (draft — human will refine)
-
P&L / bill (K.L. Gupta): Your Faridabad plots sit on DHBVN with cleanroom air that does not sleep when a line pauses. We sit read-only on the existing meters, put a rupee on which chiller bank or moulding start drove MD, assign it on WhatsApp, and keep the outcome verified with evidence on our ledger. 60-Day Proof on one feeder. Two redacted bills to see if the band is even worth a paid run. Solar stays; this is the operating remainder.
-
Maintenance (Ramniwas / HVAC): This is not an energy-manager job. It is fewer 2 a.m. chiller and compressor calls, and a clearer idle-off list that does not fight AHU interlocks. We do not write to PLCs. You execute stagger and idle; we show ₹ and evidence. Kartar’s old utility map (chillers, WFI, air, HT/LT) is the worklist.
-
Production: We will not touch validated cycle times or cleanroom pressure. The Rx is sequencing starts and cutting idle utilities in confirmed no-batch windows so OEE is not the bill’s enemy. If a card fights dispatch, it dies.
5. Before you reach out
Faridabad visit math: Sector 59 HSIIDC is already on the LNM route. Do not open as investor relations. Do not open as ESG. Open as one plot’s DHBVN peak.
5.1 Discovery checklist
- Confirm legal name on DHBVN invoice = Poly Medicure Limited (or exact consuming affiliate)
- Which HT is larger: Sector 59 104-105 vs 115-116 vs 117 vs IMT 33-34
- Two recent HT bills: ₹ total, MD, PF, ToD, contract demand — ₹15–40 lakh/month
[~]cluster hypothesis - Chillers / WFI / moulding on the same incomer?
- Rooftop vs AMPIN PPA settlement on this plot
- Gamma / ETO on this meter?
- Name of production GM under K.L. Gupta
- WhatsApp owner for maintenance cards (Ramniwas vs shift)
- NDA / vendor registration path
- Do not use
investorcare@as a personal greeting to Himanshu - Confirm
kl.gupta@polymedicure.combefore a second mail if bounce
5.2 Do not lead with
- Do not lead with dashboards, AI, digital twin, or group Industry 4.0
- Do not lead with ESG / net-zero 2050 / “next DISCOM bill” as the hero — lead with verified with evidence
- Do not lead with LNM as a comparable logo
- Do not promise Band A fees on a single light plot
- Do not propose HVAC setpoint cuts that threaten ISO 13485 environment
5.3 Opening hooks (email / call / WhatsApp)
- “Sector 59 / IMT — which chiller bank is on the DHBVN peak?”
- “Read-only on one Polymed HT: cleanroom air vs moulding start, rupees on WhatsApp, verified with evidence. 60-Day Proof.”
6. Risks, flags, controversies & sources
6.1 Integrity / controversy / regulatory (search explicitly)
Searched (Aug 2026): Poly Medicure / Polymed + Faridabad + NGT, HSPCB, lawsuit, fraud, labour, tax raid, pollution, recall.
- Stamp duty order 15 Jun 2026: Delhi Revenue ₹2.5 Cr (₹1.00 Cr deficit + ₹1.50 Cr penalty) on 2021–2024 share allotments. Company says duty already paid via depositories and is contesting. Not a plant pollution story. Cite as a live legal/IR item; do not moralise.
- Trademark: Poly Medicure vs Polybond India (Delhi HC, 2019, POLYSURE) — ordinary IP dispute, old.
- NGT / Faridabad units 2025–26: broad HSPCB delay stories on illegal metal units. Polymed not identified as a named respondent in searches run here; some neighbourhood noise/vibration items treat them as a complainant. Do not attach generic Faridabad NGT dockets to Polymed.
- POSH / labour: AR discloses ICC compliance; FY26 extra-ordinary ₹6.8 Cr labour-code gratuity provision — accounting, not a raid.
- Product recalls / CDSCO: none found in this pass. Absence ≠ clearance.
None found for fraud, tax raid, or promoter criminality in reviewed sources.
6.2 Data quality flags
- CIN in some briefs (…067008) is wrong; use L40300DL1995PLC066923
- Bill band is cluster
[~], not a meter fact - Group moulding/assembly counts ≠ Sector 59 counts
- BRSR GJ ≠ Faridabad ₹
kl.gupta@inferred from patterninfo@/cs@/investorcare@on polymedicure.com — confirm- Kartar is former (May 2026)
- Palwal is FY27, not a 2026 visit plant
- FY26 consol includes European acquisitions — do not use consol growth as Faridabad load growth
6.3 Sources consulted
- https://www.polymedicure.com
- AR FY24-25 / AGM notice (BSE / Business Standard republication) — CIN, plants, employees 3,082, AMPIN JV, emails
- IR Q1 FY26 (8 Aug 2025) and Q4 & FY26 (25 May 2026) — geo mix, 15 plants, machine counts, Palwal FY27, capex ₹296 Cr FY26
- Medgate / results commentary — ₹325 Cr capex FY25
- BRSR FY24-25 — energy GJ, ISO 9001/13485/14001, PAT No, 9.9 MWp PPA, ISO 50001 absent
- ScanX — stamp duty order Jun 2026
- LexTechSuite — Polybond trademark 2019
- LinkedIn: K.L. Gupta, Himanshu Baid, Ramniwas Pal, Abhit Kumar Gupta, Rahul Dev Bhardwaj, Kartar Singh Rawat
- Company LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/poly-medicure-ltd
- Stamped ICP v2; messaging canon; Faridabad DHBVN context
leads/lead-research-master-company-index.md— not listed (net-new)